Personal air travel has escalated given that the COVID pandemic started. Fox Business Grady Trimble with more.While some significant airlines have punished emotional support animals, many family pet owners want to pay top dollar for their animal buddies– whether they offer psychological assistance or not.According to a new consumer study by Value Penguin, 80% of pet owners state they would pay more money to secure a cabin seat for their pet versus the freight hold.One in 5 respondents even said they d be willing to shell out more than $300 to get their pet on an aircraft while nearly 2 in five stated they d be willing to spend more than $100. CANINE OWNERS PROTEST AIRLINES EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ANIMAL BAN: I WILL NOT BE STICKING HIM IN CARGOMeanwhile, 22% stated they d spend less than $100 to guarantee their pet has a spot on the plane.Most animal owners want to pay top dollar for their animal companions, according to a Value Penguin survey. (iStock)Of those who are encouraging of animals on aircrafts, 24% informed Value Penguin they d attempt their finest to prevent an airline company that has limiting pet policies.Although not all travelers are fans of psychological support animals and animals on industrial flights, many believe exceptions can be made when there is a legitimate requirement for it.WOMAN BRINGS MINI SERVICE HORSE ON AMERICAN AIRLINES FLIGHTS AS DOT CONSIDERS BANThirty-three percent of the studys participants said they think a restricted choice of animals need to be allowed on planes while 31% stated they believe animals ought to be let on a flight if a guest has a “valid reason.”Another 20% stated they believe animals ought to be allowed on an airplane without constraints, but they also note that there ought to be clear rules and guidelines in place.Thirteen percent of customers think people who wish to bring animals on a flight need to need to pay additional for their ticket.THE STRANGEST SUPPORT ANIMALS PEOPLE TRIED TO BRING ON COMMERCIAL FLIGHTSValue Penguins study comes three months after the U.S. Department of Transportation revealed emotional support animals would no longer be thought about service animals under the Air Carrier Access Act, which removes federal defense from animals that do not carry out a task.According to the Americans with Disabilities Act, a service animal is defined as a dog that has been separately trained to do work or perform jobs for an individual with a disability, and the “job(s) carried out by the canine must be directly associated to the persons impairment.”Service animals carry out a job that straight connects to a persons impairment, according to the Americans with Disabilities Act. (iStock)Dogs and other animals that entirely offer convenience or psychological assistance do not fit the ADAs requirements. Without the same acknowledgment as their service animal counterparts, emotional support animals are not allowed federal government facilities or organizations that serve the general public, including commercial airlines.GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HEREShortly after the Department of Transportations announcement, numerous airlines updated previous boarding policies to leave out emotional assistance animals, including American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, JetBlue, Southwest Airlines, Frontier and Alaska Airlines.In recent years, some airline travelers have made headlines for attempting to bring unconventional emotional support animals on flights, ranging from birds, hamsters, pigs, horses and more.CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESSThese odd circumstances might be a reason that 34% of customers informed Value Penguin they support the restriction of psychological assistance animals on flights although they feel bad that people who are genuinely in need may be harmed by the policy.

By